Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Antonia Lively Breaks the Silence by David Samuel Levinson
Antonia Lively Breaks the Silence by David Samuel Levinson
Copyright 2013
Algonquin Books - Contemporary Fiction
313 pp.
Source: Unsolicited from Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill; a June release
Catherine has been a widow for about a year, her husband's mysterious death still haunting her. She's working in a bookstore, not making enough to get by, grieving deeply, occasionally going out with friends but otherwise drinking a lot of wine, working, pondering. When young Antonia Lively, an author whose novel is selling like hotcakes, moves to town, Catherine is intrigued. She read Antonia's book with fascination. Her own husband's book was supposed to have made their fortune but Henry Swallow, a respected book reviewer, trashed it and the book didn't sell.
With Antonia Lively's appearance comes Henry Swallow. Henry is back in Catherine's life and she is not happy, but she needs the money and renting her cottage to Henry, whose home has burned, seems reasonable at first . . . and then intolerable. What possessed Henry to tear apart a book that many others said hinted of brilliance? How were Catherine and Henry connected, in the past? How did Catherine's husband die? And, what secret is Antonia Lively keeping from her new love?
I found Antonia Lively Breaks the Silence both engrossing and bizarrely vague. Quite a contrast, but I think the writing is beautiful and it definitely drew me in. There was just something about the storyline . . . the peeling of the layers to reveal the core . . . that was too slow, too broadly painted. I wanted the author to be more direct about what happened and what he was trying to say. Still, it's a bookish novel about bookish people and that alone was entertaining.
A few quotes I marked, the first three because of vocabulary and the latter two because they're thought-provoking:
Had her show of friendliness simply been an act? Catherine wasn't sure, but she was sure about Antonia's irrefragable talent, which, she had to admit, was exciting to her. Wyatt, she knew, would have hated the story, not because it was terrible but, on the contrary, because it wasn't.
--p. 33
irrefragable - Adjective 1. Impossible to refute 2. Indisputable
Lover and amanuensis, Catherine thought, but said, "I wasn't sure he was interested."
--p. 62
amanuensis - Noun: A literary or artistic assistant, in particular one who takes dictation or copies manuscripts.
" . . . their kisses flat and cool whereas they'd once been warm and tumid."
--p. 74
tumid - Adjective (esp. a part of the body): Swollen
"Everyone does have something to say," Jane said, frowning. "Don't you think so, too, Antonia?"
Antonia paused thoughtfully before answering: "I think there's something to that, yes. I also think it's important to see that as writers we have an obligation to give our voices to those who can't speak. We have to speak for the living who might not be able, and for the dead who can't."
--p. 94
"Good fiction lies to get at the truth," Wyatt used to say. "Good journalism tells the truth to get at the lies. It's only great literature that does both. It presents a world in which the two aren't just intertwined, they're inseparable." What differentiates a good writer from a great writer, then, Catherine thought, is the victory of his lies -- the scope and determination of his imagination.
--p. 113
The bottom line:
Recommended - I liked the bookish aspects, the talk about literature and the fact that most of the key characters were connected in some way to books or writing. And, the surprise ending actually did surprise me. But, I thought the author could have been a bit more direct and less circumspect in his writing. It took too long to peel the damn onion, in other words, and once he did . . . I wasn't entirely certain that I understood what had just been thrown at me. I didn't feel intrigued enough to desire an immediate reread but I wouldn't count that out in the future.
Cover thoughts: Don't you just love that cover? I think it's beautiful. And, what writer/booklover doesn't adore the sight of a typewriter?
©2013 Nancy Horner. All rights reserved. If you are reading this post at a site other than Bookfoolery or its RSS feed, you are reading a stolen feed. Email bookfoolery@gmail.com for written permission to reproduce text or photos.
4 comments:
Thank you for visiting my blog! I use comment moderation because apparently my blog is a spam magnet. Don't worry. If you're not a robot, your comment will eventually show up and I will respond, with a few exceptions. If a comment smacks of advertising, contains a dubious link or is offensive, it will be deleted. I love to hear from real people! I'm a really chatty gal and I love your comments!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have this one set aside to read fairly soon and I've been so curious about it. The blurb is quite vague, even. I'm hoping I feel that it's worth the read in the end. I usually find bookish novels get a little bit of a boost, too.
ReplyDeleteYes, the blurb is vague and the book is vague. But, it's good. I would have liked the answers to all the questions the book asked to be more concrete but I still liked it. Bookish novels do get a lot of love for the sake of their topic, definitely.
DeleteI WANT TO READ IT! cool. your review has provoked me to get this... PS HOWDY.
ReplyDeleteHello, Carrie. :)
DeleteI hope you enjoy this one. I just got your card (which does look like wallpaper, yes -- in fact, I watched a movie in which the wallpaper looked so much like the card that I had a private chuckle). Will email you, ASAP! Or, you can email me if you find time, first.