No, but the logic of it! A Man's ready to hang himself -- and she won't pay up because, oh dear me, she's not inclined to concern herself with money matter! A real piece of feminine logic! That's precisely why I never have liked and never will like talking to women. I'd rather sit on a barrel of gunpowder. I'd love to see this play performed. It was hilarious reading.
My heart sank within me. The sorapus nutshell had proved a false prophet, and, after all, my intuition had been correct -- it was the left-hand channel that I should have followed. Right. Because all women are simpering wimps who collapse at the realization they've made a poor decision.
'Women,' said Psmith, helping himself to trifle, and speaking with the air of one launched upon his special subject, 'are, one must recollect, like -- like -- er, well, in fact, just so.'Psmith, losing his characteristic wit for a brief moment in Psmith in the City
You seriously have to love the guy for dodging the issue in such an adorable manner, don't you?
And a couple of Psmith's remarks on work:
p.44 of Psmith in the City
p. 48 of Psmith in the City
Mr. Bickersdyke sat in his private room at the New Asiatic Bank with a pile of newspapers before him. At least, the casual observer would have said that it was Mr. Bickersdyke. In reality, however, it was an active volcano in the shape and clothes of the bank-manager.
Who would you want to hang out with? Chekov? Burroughs? Wodehouse?
Definitely Wodehouse. :) I have heard such great things of him as a writer. Love the quotes!
ReplyDeleteKrista,
ReplyDeleteI've heard he was a really great guy, too. Wodehouse gets my vote!
I am going with Chekov because I just love how angry and self-contradictory he is with his opinionations there. Ironically, I bet those are two more traits he would attribute to the women he hate/loves so much.
ReplyDeleteDaniella,
ReplyDeleteGreat choice for terrific reasons! Plus, he was pretty good-looking, wasn't he? The contradiction was just a part of what made that play such a work of comic genius. He was truly an amazing writer.
Not Burroughs, that's for sure!
ReplyDeleteSoftdrink,
ReplyDeleteYep. :)
typical of me: I've read a bio of Wodehouse and still haven't gotten myself to read a book by him! just slips by me. Guess I better make that a bigger priority.
ReplyDeleteCare,
ReplyDeleteI've done the opposite -- read a bunch of his books (including short stories) but I haven't gotten to that bio, yet. I do have a bio about him, though. You should definitely read him. I try to foist Wodehouse on everyone. He was a wonder.
I could weep with frustration at my choices. Oh wait. I'm a woman. I suppose that means I should have already been in hysterics over it? Burroughs, not my guy.
ReplyDeleteCarrie,
ReplyDeleteWomen, wimpettes, wishy-washy . . . apparently, they all mean the same thing. I could do without Burroughs, myself. One must remember he is the man who brought us Tarzan and Jane. What did Jane do all day? Did she stay home making skirts out of leaves and crying if Tarzan stayed out too late?