In Passage, Dr. Joanna Lander, is a research psychologist studying Near-Death Experiences (NDEs). To gather material for study, she spends her time interviewing people who have just had NDEs. Maurice Mandrake, author of Life at the End of the Tunnel (fake title; Mandrake is a fictional character who appears to be patterned after Moody but lacking in scruples), is Joanna's bane. He works in the same hospital and the two are constantly racing to capture the stories of recent near-death patients. But, Mandrake has an agenda; he is convinced that there is a heaven and he uses leading statements to convince patients that they've seen things that prove there's a heaven.
Joanna pairs up with a neurologist named Dr. Richard Wright, who has come up with a way to chemically simulate NDEs and observe the patterns of brain activity while the simulated NDEs are occurring. But, when they find that Mandrake has contaminated their list of volunteers and realize they have a limited amount of time to come up with results in order to continue their funding, Joanna agrees to "go under" for the sake of keeping the research on track. And, where she travels is both fascinating and terrifying.
I'm not going to say much about where this book heads, plot-wise because I fear if I mentioned where Joanna travels during her NDEs, it would be a spoiler (although I figured it out pretty quickly), although I should mention that she doesn't technically die. On to love/dislike . . .
What I loved about Passage:
I loved the setting and details about the "place" to which Joanna is transported during her NDEs. Let's just say it's particularly apropos, this year. And, I love Willis' trademark eye for the absurdities of life. In Passage, the hospital is like a maze and I can relate to that. I once worked in a hospital that was very maze-like -- not to the extreme of the hospital in Passage, but it was definitely confusing. There is also a cafeteria that is almost never open, so Joanna frequently eats out of Richard's lab coat pockets, where he keeps a surprising stash of food and drinks.
Passage is also gripping enough that I read the nearly-800-pages in 3 days (that's fast for me). While it's not my favorite book by Willis, I still believe she can do no wrong. There is a shocking turn of events that totally threw me in the third section of the book. I was completely stunned; I may have even gasped aloud. It's well done and genuinely unexpected, totally changes the direction of the story and leads to a satisfying, if a bit eyebrow-raising, denouement.
I also liked the fact that, since the book is set in Denver, the author mentioned The Tattered Cover. Way to go, Connie Willis! I love it when an author has one of his or her characters mention a real-world bookstore if the setting is a genuine city, even just in passing.
What I disliked about Passage:
It could have been a bit shorter and less technical, I think. However, not being a scientist I can't say whether or not a lot of the yawn-worthy passages that included scientific detail (such as the following) were completely necessary:
"How the feeling of significance factors into the choice of scenario is one of the things I want to explore," Richard said. "Also, does the scenario remain the same, or does it change depending on the stimuli, or the initial stimulus?""The initial stimulus? I thought you said--""That the unifying memory fit all the stimuli? I did, but the initial stimulus may be what determines the choice of one suitable image over another. That would explain why religious images are so prevalent. If the initial stimulus was a floating feeling, there would be very few suitable memories, except for angels.""Or Peter Pan."
~p. 303 of Passage
Note that there's still a little humor inserted into a mostly-technical passage. The story is always entertaining, even if at times the detail can be a little heavy.
I'm going to put a spoiler passage at the end of this post. I don't think it's really all that spoilery, but it could mess with the experience for people who like everything to be a surprise, so I'll set it off with a warning. I'm going to even include a quote I love.
Highly recommended to fans of Connie Willis and those who like science fiction (emphasis on the science -- no time travel, outerspace, etc., in this one). It would be a mistake to avoid Passage because of its genre because it really is just a good novel that happens to have a scientific storyline. Great characterization, dialogue and storytelling, in general. I can never close a Connie Willis book without wanting to scrounge on my shelf for more.
I'll save recent arrivals for tomorrow. For now . . . the spoiler:
--------------WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! --------------------
----------JUST SKIP THIS PART IF YOU'RE A WORRIER, OKAY?--------------
I just love this. When Joanna's brain is in near-death simulation, she finds herself on the Titanic. The question is . . . does everyone go to the Titanic when they die or was there some specific trigger that caused her mind to go there? If so, why does she keep returning to the same place? If you're a Titanic buff, you'll find it very fun reading the details as Joanna slowly makes her way around the ship. Here's a quote I loved which, I think, goes a long way toward explaining why I am fascinated by the Titanic disaster:
The lesson of the Titanic was that people kept on trying even when they knew it was hopeless--tapping out SOSs, cutting the collapsibles free, going belowdecks and bringing the mail up, letting the dogs loose-- all of them determined to save something, someone, even though they knew they couldn't save themselves.~p. 719
END SPOILER - You may now pick up your delicate bone china cup with pinkie sticking out and make a "Hummph!" noise if you had no choice but to skip this part (or are offended that it was such a let-down).
©2012 Nancy Horner. All rights reserved. If you are reading this post at a site other than Bookfoolery and Babble or its RSS feed, you are reading a stolen feed. Email email@example.com for written permission to reproduce text or photos.
This is a book that I have had on my shelf for the longest time, and have heard nothing but good things about. I need to make time for it given your feelings, and I enjoyed this review so very much. I love twisty and atmospheric reads that totally astound the reader.ReplyDelete
I am not kidding when I say I think Connie Willis can do no wrong -- that's 3 books' worth of experience speaking. I've got a few of her titles left, thank goodness. :) I hope you do read it, sometime soon. It's really a great read. The pages flew.
Lucky for you I don't have a bone china cup. ;) I love the cover of this one and near death experiences fascinate me but 800 pages?! Eeek!ReplyDelete
I found it a pretty quick read because it's so gripping, Jenny, but . . . yeah. Chunksters tend to intimidate me on a normal basis. For some reason, I've been in the mood to read thick books, lately. Not sure where that's coming from!Delete
I love how she uses metaphors in her books and they are so large (like the maze of a hospital) that you don't see it until the end of the book. I loved the technical stuff, so I guess I'm an oddball (that's also why I liked Michael Crichton's fiction so much - lots of science-ish details and explanations).ReplyDelete
Oh, don't get me wrong, I really liked the science aspect. But, there were times I wondered if so much of it was really necessary and very rarely was tempted to skim just a bit. I didn't; you just never know what kind of gem she's going to throw at you.
I love Michael Crichton, too. I remember reading The Andromeda Strain when I took a little one for a pediatrician's appointment (obviously, a while ago). We had a terrific discussion about it; the doctor said it was required reading in medical school. I haven't read Crichton's more recent books, though, because I was irritated at his noisy dismissal of climate change.